The Yin and Yang of Guitar Forums

Collings AT-1 Dark Burst, Courtesy of Eddie’s Guitars

I was about to undergo my fourth back surgery and knew I was going to be laid-up for a couple of months, so I was setting myself up with things to stay busy until I’d recovered enough to re-engage with my usual activities. I’d wondered about these online guitar platforms such as the Unofficial Martin Guitar Forum (UMGF), Acoustic Guitar Forum (AGF), TDPRI (Fender Telecaster discussion group), and several others, so I did a little homework and became a member of the “Big Three” and signed on to a few smaller communities just for good measure. As you’d envision, they are essentially online chatrooms formed in the mid-to-late 2000’s, at the beginning of the beginning of the social media craze. As opposed to sites like Facebook and Myspace at the time, these were guitar-centric organizations intended for the express purpose of providing a space for guitarists to commune and post questions and answers about guitars. UMGF and AGF are for acoustic guitar players and TDPRI is primarily for electric guitarists who mostly play either a Fender Telecaster or Stratocaster. There are sites that are geared toward most of the major manufacturers, though, for a number of reasons the manufacturers themselves do not own the sites and seldom contribute. The owners of such sites are typically guitar afficionados who take it upon themselves to invest in and build platforms that function as a place where guitar players can exchange information, ask the forum questions, or provide the forum with answers or solutions to problems. Essentially, to have passionate, open discussions on their faorite topic. There is also a place on each site to buy and sell guitars and related gear, talk specifically about vintage guitars, review various makes and models, post sound-clips and favorite guitar videos, and discuss famous players and their styles and techniques. There is typically a cornucopia of information as guitarists help each other make decisions on what guitars to buy and what is the best available technology in related gear.

The year was 2019 and these forums had already been around for ten or more years before I joined at a time which proved to be the beginning of the end. People had begun to jump ship and spend their time on more socially driven social media forums such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. The guitar forums were in a constant state of flux and people inexplicably began leaving in droves, defaulting to the most strident members, people who tended to be older and less inclined to leave the sanctity of their beloved forums or the warm and comforable nooks in there homes where they sit, tending to these sites at all hours of the day and night. I stuck with it for several years as it was still a place where I could contribute knowledge both as a long-time player and gear fanatic. I’d become an expert on “boutique” guitar manufacturers and vintage acoustic guitars, along with curating my own fairly significant collection of both acoustic and electric guitars. To me, this great hobby of mine was much more involved than just playing guitar and learning to be a better guitarist, it became something far more intensive and that meant learning everything I possibly could about guitars, from the origins of the first stringed instruments centuries ago to to modern guitars of today and everything in-between. Before retiring, I’d had a rewarding career in engineering and project management and, for many of those years, I’d been a competitive endurance athlete for which I was now paying the price with a rapidly degenerating spine. My lower back was going to hell in a handbasket forcing me to leave many of my beloved activities behind. By the time I joined these forums I was all but done for physically and would be needing some alternative oulets if I were to save my sanity.

I wrote my first blog just days before the 2019 surgery, followed by another blog the next day, but I was so focused on my recovery and the potential for getting some of my activities back, that I dropped my attention from the blog altogether. It would be four years and several brushes with death over some other severe health problems before I would pick up where I left off. My entry into the world of blogging started innocently enough. I would write a perspective on a new guitar I’d acquired, or write about my favorite guitar influences. There might be a simple post on what strings I use and why or which “boutique” brands I believe to be at the top of the heap. Boutique guitars are typically made by smaller builders with fewer employees who are talented and disciplined enough to use “Old World” processes, techniques, and tools while eschewing the use of automation in the construction of very finely crafted guitars. In other words, companies who employ skilled luthiers in making these guitars predominantly by hand, without the obvious production benefits behind using high-tech tools and machinery. There is a lot of space on these forums which is dedicated to comparing the various boutique brands against the best production guitars made by companies like Martin, Gibson, and Taylor. Aside from writing about guitars, I’ve written pieces nature, music, social issues, endangered species, some of my adventure trips, watches, cycling, skiing, what it’s like to be caught in the crossfire of the opioid crisis, and a host of other topics.

It was before I started my own WordPress site to become more formally engaged in writing that I was at all focused on guitar forums. For the first year, or so, I enjoyed contributing to these forums but somewhere into the second or third year, I began to notice a shift in the kinds of responses I was getting, which had gone from friendly and gracious to argumentative and downright combative. This is where you need to have an understanding of the inner workings of these forums. While there are ten’s of thousands subscribers, there are cliques that form and will come together like a beehive in order to defend any one of their group who seems to be having trouble over a particular topic or is doing battle with the posts’s author (the OP, or “Original Poster”) or someone else in the thread. If you are a poster and are having differences with another member, the next thing you know, there are a half-dozen other members rushing to the aid of the one and you find yourself in the sights of a clique. Put differently, what were once satisfying replies and comments to a particular post I’d written were now belligerent personal affronts. I believe what happened was that the site’s “trolls” were OK with me as long as I wasn’t answering more complicated questions, before I upped my game and had begun accruing more and more followers. It seems that I had unwittingly wandered into their territories and they wanted to put an end to it before they lost all-too-important “street-cred”. These kinds of negative responses weren’t targeted at me alone, but anyone who was writing at a higher than average level, both in terms of content, but also in terms of writing itself. For me personally, I’ve always enjoyed writing and, over many years, have become quite comfortable with the subject matter surrounding guitars. I had no difficulty in taking these people on and found it easy to put them in their place, without the use of foul lanquage or meaningless put-downs. But things got uncomfortable during my third or fourth altercation with one of UMGF’s most prolific and longest standing members, when he decided to really let me have it and got so worked-up that I believe he would have shot me if the whole of the internet didn’t stand between us. After the second or third communication between us, he began writing childish but incendiary insults and lobbing them over the fence. I had called him out and he had all-too-willingly answered the call. Before the trouble began, the post had fostered a good number of contributors and was an already lengthy thread with dozens of replies, so we’d already attracted many onlookers as well as the site’s moderators and the site administrator, himself, who shut us down and closed the post so that it was no longer accessible to anyone, including me. What happened in the next twenty-four hours is the real travesty. The administrator had edited the entire thread from the point where the argument started to where he had ended the post. He then reposted the thread. He had done much of his editing by deleting most of what I had to say and leaving out the ugliest comments made by my opponent, cleaning-up his mess while making me appear to be the uninformed aggressor. I wrote the administrator directly and gave him no quarter while delivering both barrels. He must have felt the sting because by the next day I’d been rewarded by having my membership revoked. I’d known that this was a possibility beause I’d read about being blackballed from other members of these sites, so this came as no surprise, nor did it come at a great loss. I certainly wasn’t about to let it get under my skin. But it made me wonder how the two people, the senior member and the administrator, could have become so close for the one to so clearly take the side of the other. There are similar alliances all over these sites, often between long-standing and prolific contributors and their “followers” who tend to gain confidence once taken under the wing of a well-known member. It’s probably not dissimilar to prison gang rivalries where a less powerful, more timid inmate takes a submissive stance with a given leader (or,”shot-caller”) and does things to prove himself worthy of joining in exchange for the “protection” of the leader and his henchmen. On some of these sites, a senior member may have been around since the forum’s inception and thus has the abundant gratitude of the site’s management and even its owner(s). Some of these folks will have gained such notoriety as to have thousands of followers at their beckon call…good little foot-soldiers in the fight over who’s more knowledgable, the relative newcomer or the tried and true old-timer. These senior contributors with ten or fifteen years of membership behind them tend to be of an older crowd and enjoy the status they feel within he fabric of the forum. To their credit, they are almost invariably highly knowledgable and better that average as writers whose aim it is to get their point across. Virtual friendships and allegiances between people who have known one another for firteen years online, but who have never actually met. Somehow, I just don’t “get” this but it is a dynamic that exists on every forum I’ve contributed to, When these battles come to a head, I’ve been swarmed by as many as a dozen “insurgents” borne out of a simple disagreement between two forum users. I couldn’t passibly keep up without typing so fast as to set my keyboard ablaze, so I choose the most eggregious offenders and take on their comments along with those of their leader. I am sure that this topic would be great fodder for psychiatric experts to tear into. The “why” riding the undercurrent of ill-fated personality types and their inevitable engagement when situations like this arise. In retrospect, I’m surprised at myself for getting as angry as I did at the time. Not unlike road rage, the root of the problem between the two parties is really quite foolish but it escalates disproportionately to the the reasoning beheind it. In my own defense, it wasn’t just the one thing that got me riled enough to don armor and step onto the battlefield, but the downward trend these sites were experiencing because, aisde from those particular moments while in the heat of doing battle, I got a lot of enjoyment out of reading an untold number of posts and contributing a fair number of my own. There’s was a lot of “good stuff” to be found there. But, as someone famously once said, “all good things come to an end”.

This same thing happened to me on another of the preeminant forums. I guess I must have a problem. ;-). Perhaps that problem is that I refuse to allow these trolls to control any of these forums by fear. Many people are fearful of putiing themselves out there only to be criticized by others. I have done my best to give them a voice even if it’s not a popular opinion that they’re attampting to peddle. The problem is that the more these forums become places where people attempt to validate themselves and the site’s seemingly continue to promote their “Good ol’ Boy” networks, the more people are going to leave and take their guitar-centric worlds with them. The greater problem is that once these forums reach extiction, there will be no place to go the obtain free advice on complex, guitar related issues and nowhere for the many thousands of us who enjoy belonging to a like-minded, music based community. I find this to be unfortunate because I enjoy helping people, whether it’s about which guitars bring forth the best overall value or what kind of guitar strap to use. More complicated questions are always welcome, and haing a place to write an essay regarding tonewoods and which ones work best for differing applications, is quite satisfying. In this respect, I know that I am not alone, nor am I alone in hoping that one day there will be a resurgence of such platforms. Unfortunately, there may already be too much damage done as to how I feel about these forums for me to regain the intense interest that I once had. Unless these forum owners soon do an about face to entice their members from moving on, the mass exodus from their sites will continue and I don’t see these sites as having enough articifcial intelligence to save themselves. The fact is, these guitar forums are already on their way to mass extinction and I believe they will continue to lose members because they are clearly making no efforts to keep them. In the conext of my own experience with these sites and being an extremely knowledgable resource who is forever eager to share that knowledge, it is the rest of the membership who are penalized when I’m forced out of the picture by management. If people are afraid to share their vast knowledge for fear of retribution from some silly “gang leader”, then it is the site administrators and owners who are culpable for allowing this kind of negative atmosphere to exist while on “their watch”. It is these people who owe ex-members an appology for not meeting their expectations of providing a safe environment for people to air their collective knowledge openly without having the “other shoe drop” when they’ve lauched yet another solid, well-informed post that speaks for itself. It is the job of the site’s owner(s) and administrators to maintain such a space which was their intention when launching their creations in the first place. There are obviously greater reasons behind the loss of popularity of similar forums all over the internet. Do people only want topical knowledge on a given subject or are there others out there, people like me, who lament the loss of site’s where significant amounts of information can be found and exchanged?

2011 Fender “Telebration” Series Reclaimed Old Growth Redwood Telecaster

It was something to do during the recovery periods associated with the number of major surgeries and health setbacks I’ve had during those same times. Now, I obviously have my own dedicated space, in part, to write about music and my love of “all things guitar”. I also contribute to a number of guitar-centric platforms on Quora.

Tactical Watches

I first found Luminox, a military watch supplier in 1991. It was Christmas-time and I was visiting a watch store when my eye caught something different, something highly unique. I was shopping for my wife, but you know how that goes! I was more than a little curious about these luminous”tritium” watches, in a case of their own showcasing a number of different models. I picked one out and the store manager took me into a dark storeroom so I could see this watch do its thing. For each hour marker, there was a tiny tube filled with tritium, a phosphorescent, radioactive gas. The tips of the watch bands had even tinier tubes of this material. The lume was absolutely amazing and I knew that I had to have this watch.

Luminox is known for designing its watches to meet military specifications, including having a case that can withstand a dive depth of 200 meters and handle dirt, sand, mud, and be highly shock resistant. Today, the more expensive models are built around a stainless steel, titanium, or carbon fiber (Carbonox) case. These are some of the most durable watches on the planet. Back in the 90’s, I believe Luminox had an exclusive agreement with the Swiss-made owner of the patent for tritium, as used in its watches but by the year 2000, there were several other manufacturers that became Luminox competitors, also offering a high level of build quality and made to either the same or similar specifications. Names like Praetorian, TAWATEC, Armourlite/Isobrite, and others had come on line and were offering well-crafted, tritium designs. Various militaries around the world began contracting with these companies to supply their special forces.

It was about this time that many outdoorsmen and extreme athletes had come to take notice of this new watch phenomenon.  Watch enthusiasts and collectors everywhere had come to find what the fuss was about. Casio G-Shock had long been a military supplier with its bombproof models designed for extreme use and is, today, one of the biggest suppliers of tactically -oriented watches to the US military. Many soldiers simply purchase their own time pieces and the burly, large-cased designs appeal to many young people in the military. These are not your “el Cheapo” Casio’s that you can find for $50 to $125, but much more seriously built models that start at around $400 MSRP. The company even makes a number of models ranging in price from $600 to over $1,000 and are highly thought of in military circles. But, even with such stiff competition, Luminox is still among my three favorite brands. My only gripe is one of case diameter. Luminox’s early designs were spec’d-out with a case dimension of 44 mm, which seemed large enough back in the day. In thirty years, that dimension has only grown to 46 mm, which is a bit smaller than some of their competition. G-Shock’s tactical designs are between 51 mm and 55 mm, and most of the other companies have most models dimensioned at 47 mm. Some, even larger. The trend has long been for larger, more robust designs.

About five years ago, I discovered a brand I hadn’t before seen. It’s a relatively young company called “Nite”, based in Christchurch, UK. I had an overnight infatuation with Nite’s “Hawk” model. My last two watches, including my daily driver, have been acquired through Nite’s sumptuous website, which is the only means of buying one.  I have a Nite Hawk blackout and the same watch, but with a cool orange face. Like other companies, Nite’s watches are designed in one place (the UK) and manufactured in another (Switzerland…the same country in which the tritium is produced). With its Hawk series, you can see a strong resemblance to watches made by Luminox and Isobrite, Traser, and Marathon, with large (51 mm) and burly cases, all good for diving to 200 meters and withstanding considerable abuse, as would be seen in the military. Nite has four or five lines. with a watch for everyone, but only the Hawk is 51 mm. The others are quite a bit smaller but are beautiful timepiece examples with a more sophisticated look that would work nicely at the office or on a night out with friends.

When it comes to luminescence, tritium is not the only option. Many companies, such as Citizen, use luminescent paint, the best of which is called “Superluminova”. This stuff is like the luminescent paint used on many watches by Seiko back in the day, except on steroids. With a bright light charge for a few minutes, these watches will luminesce through most of the night, getting linearly dimmer with each passing hour. Still, they are extremely good watches built to a large watch case. These, too, meet military specifications for build quality and waterproofing. I very much like Citizen’s “Eco-drive” Professional models. These can be had for a little more than $500, MSRP, and there are automatic chronograph models which are priced at around $800. I got both of my Nite watches on sale for $450. Most Luminox’s are $600, and up.

In terms of longevity, Luminox states that its tritium tubes last for an average of twelve years (based on the half-life of Tritium, which is a  radioactive element, harmless when used in the tiny quantities related to watch luminescence), with 25 years being the maximum. There are now a few companies offering T-100 tritium which is, in my opinion, is a bit over the top – particularly if you’re a nighttime military operator whose life depends on not being seen. Since the tritium tubes are all sourced from the same Swiss company. results can be expected to be the same across the board. Luminox has an all-encompassing warranty of two years, but you must buy from an authorized dealer to get the warranty. Other manufacturers offer a warranty period of one to two years.

While tritium is radioactive, it is well contained and well below hazardous limits. A quick search reveals several Swiss companies that are associated with tritium, but the company that first came out with the tritium watch tubes is MB Microtec. You can learn more about tritium at:

https://mbmicrotec.com/en/

One of the earliest watch makers to use tritium is Ball Watches with its “Engineer” dive model which has expanded into the Engineer I, II, and III. This is an extremely beautiful and well built dive watch which can be found at a higher price point of between $2K and $3K. They use multiple colors, larger tubes, and light up the night like a Christmas tree. I would be.ore comfortable wearing these for a night out than having it get battered around while I’m wrenching on my ATV. It’s just not that kind of a watch but more like a fine timepiece. But, I wouldn’t have any hesitation to recommend it as a dive watch, which is where the design features lie. Unlike some of these other watches, Ball’s Engineer would be just as at home at a black tie affair.

MTM is a lesser known company making bombproof watches. This brand is truly top-tier, extremely well made with handsome designs. But, for me, the case size is a bit on the small side (42 mm to 44 mm). In contrast, there’s Casio’s G-Shock Rangeman which is a monster of a watch. At 55 mm, it’s not only big, but is built like a tank. It runs on Casio’s solar technology, so battery life isn’t an issue. Casio has yet to utilize tritium technology but instead uses a powered backlight which requires the user to depress a button to illuminate the watch just long enough to catch the time. These watches, along with several other G-Shock models, are extremely popular with the military. They represent a real value in the marketplace, and, with their robust design and large size, they appeal to the younger, military segment. It’s safe to say that Casio’s G-Shock watches have spent more time in extreme conditions than any other watch made.