How do different hunting practices impact the behavior of wildlife in their natural habitats?

A Shorter Version is Posted on Quora

My background includes fifty-three years experience starting with hunting whitetails (both rifle and bow) with my father in the Adirondack Mountains of northern New York, not far south of the Canadian border. The year was 1973 and I was just twelve years old. I would go on hunting with my dad throughout my teen and college years until I moved to Colorado after graduation where I continued hunting for both deer and elk. I would alternate years, hunting archery season one year and go rifle the next. But I missed numerous seasons due to conflicts with my project load at work. I remember the sacrifice and the strong yearning to be in the woods. That feeling would stick with me for months.

That first year hunting in the West was in 1984 and I was just twenty three. I already had eleven years under my belt when I began my hunting journey as an adult in the best physical condition of my young life. And I did so as a soloist with just a few exceptions. Not that I would have changed anything, but my career in engineering meant that there would be times when I couldn’t breakaway. For me, that was just part of the game if you wanted to hold on to a good job in the mountains of Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah. I hunted big, rough country alone, without the aid of horses or an ATV, and would regularly cover eighteen or twenty miles in a day. For a long time, I was a competitive mountain athlete and was constantly training for an upcoming event or for the simple pleasure of being at the top of my game. Forever waiting for hunting buddies to catch up was not my idea of “fun” and I learned quickly that I enjoyed the solitude far more than the companionship – with the exception of being with my father and later, my nephew when he came of hunting age. Other than those exceptions, I would spend the rest of my hunting days going it alone.

I have hunted in every kind of weather Colorado can serve-up. Snow storms were my favorite. As an accomplished alpine and backcountry skier, I’ve skied hundreds of miles in the backcountry of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming and was more than comfortable in deep snow and temperatures ranging from ten degrees to twenty below. Horizontal rain, sleet, hail were no fun, as was the case on warm days, but they didn’t keep me in camp. In Colorado, archery seasons are nearly a month long, taking place from late August to late September and some years, it doesn’t cool down until a couple of weeks into the season. This meant hiking around at or above treeline shouldering a twenty-five pound pack and sweating through my shirt and hunting pants and having to stop once or twice a day, strip down, and hang my clothes to dry. I’d put on another layer to thwart getting chilled while my clothes were drying. This was just part of staying safe and it’s so dry in Colorado, that the drying process would typically last no longer than twenty minutes. Time for a sandwich and I’d be on my way again. For the first ten, or so, years, I had entire areas pretty much to myself but, sometime in the early 90’s, the Colorado Division of Wildlife, in its infinite wisdom, crammed a two week long muzzleloader season into the last two weeks of archery. Muzzleloading had become a trend to be reckoned with, bringing thousands of additional hunters and their money into the state each fall. While growing in popularity, archery hunters quickly became the minority and with the muzzleloaders growing in such numbers, many of whom were from out of state, I began to feel pressed for space. In came the mega-travel trailers and ATV’s along with groups of hunters ranging from four to a dozen. Many of these guys waited and looked forward to their hunting trips all year long (I couldn’t blame them) and their presence in, what were just a few years earlier, wilderness settings made it feel more like a school playground than a wild place where large, wild creatures roamed freely. Back then, when it was archery only, there were seldom enough archery hunters in a given hunting unit to have any sort of long term impact on the animals that called these places home. Often, I could hunt for days before seeing another hunter. In retrospect, it was the end of an era. A time in my life that I’m thankful to have had. I’m now sixty-four and have no one left except for my eighty-five year old dad who remembers these times in the way I do. He agrees and has stated that, for all of the same reasons, he had it even better than I did, hunting for most of his active years well before the woods were full of people and the sounds of trucks and ATV’s everywhere, and some bonfire party just a few hundred yards from what either of would consider an ideal camp.

Hunting in Colorado and many other Western states has become a huge industry. In a few states, hunting and fishing is the primary breadwinner for the state and it is the means by which many small western towns exist. The woods have become super-saturated with the sheer magnitude of hunters such that the deer and elk have changed their movements in order to avoid the mass onslaught of people roaming the woods with guns and blaze orange every autumn. The elk can no longer be found in or near their historical places, places they called home for centuries during this time of year, which included mating season (also known as “The Rut”). One reason that I’ve always enjoyed bow-hunting over rifle hunting is simply the bow and how quiet it is. Additionally, it makes hunting much more challenging than if one were toting a rifle. With a bow, it’s not unusual to shoot and miss but not scare your intended target in the slightest as opposed to the ensuing chaos a shot from a high-powered rifle can bring. The gun shots are typically followed by the sound of ATV’s and trucks driving around on the network of Forest Service access roads in an attempt to locate the downed or injured animal. Once the shooting starts with muzzleloader season in mid-September, most of the wildlife in any given hunting area all but moves out, often seeking refuge on the private lands below and staying there for several months or, depending on the location and the inclination of the individual landowners, the animals might stay straight on through to the following spring.

Rather than descend en masse with the main herds, splinter groups comprised of fifteen to twenty, up to thirty individuals will move into heavily treed (often referred to as “dark timber”) and steeper and more rugged terrain on north facing slopes (to escape the remaining warm days) until driven downward as the early, heavy snows, and cold temperatures begin to encourage them to move down low enough to survive the winter and any remaining hunters. It is only after hunter-pressure ceases in mid-Dembember that they again move about more feely to get to better sources of food and warmer temperatures associated with dropping a couple thousand feet in elevation.

What I haven’t mentioned but is a tremendously important factor in the survival of the species is the major interruptions that occur during the critical time of breeding season which takes place (approximately) from mid-September and runs through a large portion of October. This is where things get complicated and the long-term impacts from hunting can be seen by comparing the health of the gene pool from forty or fifty years ago to that of today. Because these results vary depending on where a particular herd is being studied, the topic warrants a much more thorough analysis than I can present here but I may make an attempt in future writings. Suffice it to say that there has been an overall deleterious effect due to hunting pressures and differing herd management protocols from state to state. I believe it has gone so far as to become a very big example of animal cruelty. Imagine you and your chosen mate attempting to do just that while being shot at and chased for weeks on end, never afforded the luxury of stopping and remaining in one place for long enough to be successful in this primally driven endeavor. Now imagine what it must be like for a mature, dominant bull elk to marry with as many females as he can, all the while being challenged by other bulls on top of being shot at…for up to two months a year! By the time the rut is over, the cold snows and winds of winter take over while many of these bulls are a hundred pounds underweight and too stressed to survive yet another Rocky Mountain winter.

Unfortunately, after spending thirty years in Colorado, I had the need to relocate with my wife to Central Texas. We found a place far out in the country on a slice of land and live a good life here with our three dogs. My last hunting trip was to Southwest Colorado with my dog, Kelpy, for the whole of archery elk season in 2013. I’d not hunted there in several years and in that brief period of time, hunting as I had known it for so many years had come to an end. I’d hunted this same area in 2010 but it seems that it had been “discovered’ during the three years I’d been gone. I got in there a couple of days before the season opened to find a good, out of the way place to camp, well hidden off the Forest Service access road. I was roughly thirty-five miles in on that road, and the country it serviced was steep and uninviting. My dog and I spent a wonderfully quiet night under the stars. The next day would be a long one, hiking some 20+miles reconnoitering the area. I located some elk about ten miles in from camp and observed them for a couple of hours before heading back. By now, there were a number of other camps within a few hundred yards of ours.

All things considered, this wasn’t too bad. You couldn’t see my campsite from anywhere on the road, and I sensed that no one knew we were in there. The elk I spotted weren’t accessible by road or ATV and were far enough away that it would be unlikely that any of these guys would get that far off the trail I’d used to get within five miles and the next five were gotten only by hiking off-trail. I was well prepared and knew the area well. I spent the next three weeks hiking out in the early morning after I had taken Kelpy on our run, and back an hour or two after dark. As I had expected, the first week was almost too warm to hunt as the animals wouldn’t be moving around much and mostly remaining bedded down. The next week brought torrential rains and I hunted mornings but spent afternoons with Kelpy in my military tailer reading and catching up on rest. I wanted to be ready when the weather broke, which it did for a couple of days when I was able to call-in a couple of smaller bulls. From the tracks leading in and out of the area, I knew there was one big bull in there, amongst a four and a five point and around a dozen cows, spikehorns, and yearlings.

I would get just three days and three opportunities at the medium-sized bulls, and then two days of snow followed. The temperature dropped a good twenty degrees and I hunted through the storm being careful to stay on a perimeter of a couple hundred yards. What I was waiting for was another break in the weather, which came along with eight inches of cold, dry snow on top of mud from the rains, which had saturated the ground. I had just two days left and now that I had my weather and the clock was ticking fast, it was time to employ some more aggressive tactics. I would slip in closer letting out a good close-range bugle and a lost cow chirp. I got some cow chirps in return and could hear what I knew was the big bull approach toward my position, which I changed before he got too close. I had a clean shot at sixty yards but thought I could bring him in closer. I let out some grunts and that lost cow chirp, and that did the job. It was getting dark quickly as he circled a bit while at about fifty yards but much of his body was now obscured by a bunch of deadfall…maybe six or seven downed fir trees. I stayed put, waited for as long as I could before darkness descended. Forty yards but no clear shot. Right about then (this is a situation to always be aware of) I was “made” by a couple of curious cows checking on the lost cow call. I would have heard them were it not for the freshly fallen snow. I don’t believe they even saw me at first but the evening breeze had gone from being in my favor, to swirling just the littlest bit. I’m pretty sure they’d winded me until they saw me draw back in the direction of the bull in case he somehow presented me with a shot. He’d picked his way through the deadfall up to about thirty five yards, turned and ran in the opposite direction, as did the cows. I was crestfallen, with nothing to do but go over it in my mind while making my way uphill and back towards camp. Going for a big bull during archery season is more miss than hit, so the turn of events hadn’t surprised me. While I didn’t beat myself up over it, I was bothered by it enough that instead of using my one remaining day, I decided that I was done for the year. I was exhausted and may well have run into trouble getting an animal out on the off-chance that I did shoot something. It wouldn’t have been a smart thing to do.

A huge saving grace, my forever best friend, Kelpy, was happy to see me stagger back into camp. We embraced for a moment before getting ourselves fed and going on our nightly walk. I’d played it through in my mind on the long and dark hike back to camp. Relative to the circumstances, I had made no mistakes. Don’t get me wrong, I have made a number of mistakes when in-close with large bulls during past archery seasons but had learned something during each of those encounters. Downing a large bull like that one was is no mean feat. So many obstacles to overcome just to have a chance at one. He was a big-bodied six by seven of probably seven or eight years. That’s a long life for a any bull found on public lands during hunting season.

Depending on where you are in the Western US, several things have impacted the relative livelihoods of various wildlife over the many years of hunting and game management practices. Different states manage game animals in different ways and certain states are fairing better than others. While Colorado has the overall largest number of elk that call it home, the herd as a whole is not as healthy as places like Idaho and Arizona, but I’m not an expert on land use. Administering conservation practices against huge revenue generating fish and game activities on millions of acres of land with overlapping  jurisdictions between the state wildlife agencies, the USDA Forest Service and the Federal Bureau of Land management) is a huge and highly complicated job. But the statistics taken over many years strongly indicate that some wildlife management practices work far better than others. Otherwise, the health of our country’s deer and elk populations wouldn’t be so different when comparing big game states against each other. The only thing that stands in the way of each state adopting the best overall strategies to maintain healthy individual animals and appropriately sized herds is money. As with most things, there is a strong countering relationship between managing for quality and managing for quantity. In my opinion, Colorado sells far too many elk tags to have a sustainable, healthy herd, and the overall health of Colorado’s elk has been in decline for decades. States that place more emphasis on herd quality don’t sell more tags than their herds can sustain over a long period of time.

Another significant change that I’ve witnessed over the years with elk is the amount these animals are verbally active. Hunters use various calls to get the elk communicating with them in an attempt to call their quarry into shooting range. The most exciting part of calling is in learning how to call a big, mature bull from where he is, perhaps, three or four hundred yards distant and, while continuing to call, use that little bit of time to get yourself situated and prepared to shoot should the opportunity arise. The idea is in getting your bull so focused on fending off this particular challenging bull (you) that he momentarily drops his guard and approaches straight towards you, as you draw your bow and launch a well placed shot. This is probably one of the single most captivating moments in all of outdoor sports, the feeling that you’d just accomplished what you set out to do at the beginning of the season.

During my last few hunting seasons, I began to hear an unusual trend and, by the time this season rolled by,  I noticed that the elk were barely “talking”, that there was much less vocalizing than in any of my prior hunting seasons. With so many people calling or attempting to learn, the elk have become much more selective in what they discern as genuine, or false. It should be obvious that the time to learn is well before the season begins.  All it takes is one bad call and the elk you’re after may choose to vacate the area, leaving you and your fellow hunters high and dry. There are many types of calls on the market but, in my opinion, reed calls can be the best. You just slide the little disk into your mouth and learn to use it such that you seldom let out a suspicious call. It can take years of practice not only in terms of the technical aspect , but in learning enough about why, when, and how elk communicate to know the when’s and why’s as to your own calling. As gratifying as “talking with the elk” can be, the fact that they’ve all but ceased must have farther reaching implications that don’t bode well for these animals. Imagine the disruption to humankind if we could no longer communicate using verbal language, even if it were limited to a couple of months a year. And that’s assuming they revert back to normal behavior once the combined hunting seasons come to an end. I would guess that that’s not nearly the case.

These things have conspired to make elk hunting much less enjoyable (at least for me) than it was fifteen years ago. It has bothered me enough to call an end to my years as a hunter. For years, affluent hunters have been paying large fees, including the cost of highering a guide and paying for a private lands hunt that they find to be the most desirable. Game processing is typically included. The pay-hunts like these don’t interest me and even if they did, I don’t have the kind on money to afford the associated $5K to $15K, or more, for a tag that would only be good at the game ranch I had chosen. While archery hunts of this nature have their place and have success rates of seventy-five percent, a public lands archery hunt averages around twenty percent. But, for me, I put more emphasis on the quality of the total experience and refuse to pay someone else to take me to the elk and do so enough times that I finally get my bull. I wouldn’t do it if you paid my way.

To have an opportunity like I had just a day before season’s end was a thrill I would not trade for a large bull on an expensive paid hunt. As a wonderful bonus, I had brought along my best friend, my dog, Kelpy, with whom to share the experience. That put my trip over the top! After driving down into Cortez, getting a hotel, cleaning up, and getting a good night’s rest, we were on our way home with just 1,670 miles to go! I am forever grateful for my years of roaming Colorado before it evolved into one big “sacrificial park” (where everyone goes so that other places may remain pristine).

How do we balance conservation efforts for endangered species like grizzly bears with the needs of human populations living nearby?

Portions Initially Posted to Quora

t’s time to get serious about wildlife conservation and start to think differently about our place in this world. To take into consideration the full measure of our actions and how they have impacted wild things and wild places over the history of mankind. I’m talking about a complete overhaul in the way we think about our species in relation to how we perceive creatures other than ourselves.


The brown bear (of which the grizzly is a subspecies) needs protection throughout the northern hemisphere, but the grizzly is, perhaps, the most studied and decades of progress have already been made on its behalf. From the work we’ve done and the changes we have made for them, and others such the wolf, we have provided a template for managing other large predators all over the world. It’s really not that different. In terms of the grizzly, legislation has been passed on both state and federal levels and a tremendous amount of research was needed before such legislation had a chance of being reviewed. We cannot allow ourselves to backslide even an inch and need to continue to vigorously advocate for grizzlies so they remain plentiful enough overall and in local populations to support a healthy gene pool. The single most important factor in their survival is, as it has always been, habitat preservation (which includes restrictions on human encroachment).

To take it a proactive step further, how about “habitat creation”? This is something that is happening on local levels every time someone or some family has the inclination and wherewithal to deed lands over to outfits such as the Nature Conservancy. But it needs to happen at state and federal levels, as well. As taxpayers and conservationists, wouldn’t we be willing to fund the buying-back of millions of acres of no longer productive western ranchlands? Historical ranching in semi-arid to arid landscapes is dying a slow death as more and more of the nation’s beef is grown in states like Florida and Georgia. Then you have corporate ranching  which occurs when several adjoining family owned and operated ranches are consolidated and economies of scale reduce costs as compared to the smaller family run ranches of the past. But, and perhaps surprisingly, the companies now operating these ranches are largely opposed to seeing more bears and wolves reintroduced to areas proximal to their lands. These are deep-pocketed organizations which should be accountable to their investors, which more than likely are inclined to support such programs that are on the front lines of wildlife advocacy. I believe this is a case where corporate execs are telling their shareholders one thing but doing another, all in the name of maximizing their bottom line which, in turn, makes everyone happy.  If it costs one dime to help in restoring bear and wolf habitat and supporting additional reintroduction efforts, you’ll have to pry open their hands with a crowbar to get at it.

When the dust settles, the remaining ranchers can be slow to embrace change and I can certainly understand why. Every red-blooded American kid wishes they’d grown up on a ranch somewhere out West. But running cows isn’t the only means by which ranches make money. On many mid-to-large ranches, the primary source of income is royalties from oil and natural gas leases, contracts made between the oil and gas producers and ranchers which allow for drilling and subsequent oil and gas production taking place on private ranchlands throughout the Western US.  But there remain areas of land that are home neither to cattle nor to pump jacks. These are the areas of land that I’m referring to as a prime candidate for placing some portion of these lands into conservation agreements which provide for additional wildlife habitat. Aside from offers to buy in dollars, there are incentives built into creating land trusts to help motivate land owners to strike deals with land conservancies, in some cases going so far as to afford these families the opportunity to remain on to work their lands or are at least grant them special access for things like hunting, camping, and fishing. The period of time that these provisions are set in place can be significant and the transfer of ownership can be handled in such a way that it feels as though nothing has changed. One of the oldest philosophies in the history of man is that, on occasion, the few (in this case owners of vast quantities of land) must be compelled to make sacrifices for the good of the many.  I can’t think of a more honorable thing to do than to share a portion of your land holdings so that wildlife has a far greater chance of survival than it would otherwise have had. In my book, that’s about as good as good gets.


Because we as a species are only by default the caretakers of the planet, there have been few (if any) times in our history where long-term planning focused on any species other than our own. We simply plowed ahead without regard for wildlife with one ad-hoc building project on top of another. The result of this kind of thinking has been a “no thinking at all” paradigm in favor of the expansion of man at the expense of everything else. A “Manifest Destiny” approach to first “conquering” and then populating the earth. Why? Because it’s there.

PAfter eons of putting ourselves first (at least early on it was about survival and not hubris and greed), we need to learn how to “share”…remember, that thing they tried so hard to instill in us in kindergarten?! To truly put away trivial matters and materialism and become far better versions of ourselves. Take responsibility for the things we’ve done in the name of advancing only ourselves. Because you personally didn’t clearcut vast parts of the Pacific Northwest doesn’t mean that you didn’t use the resultant lumber or, simply because what comes out of your vehicle’s tailpipe is relatively “clean” doesn’t mean that the electricity you use to fuel it didn’t come from a coal fired electric power plant somewhere in the middle of nowhere, or worse, from the power plants located on native American tribal lands in the “Great American West”. In the end, true understanding and knowledge can only come after ”peeling the onion” until you’ve gone through all the layers and reached the core. As has been echoed throughout our generations, things aren’t always as they seem.

In terms of wildlife conservation, one of the things we need to do next is to find other viable ways to increase existing habitat, more ways to repurpose or create additional wild spaces while making absolutely certain that existing habitat remains unfettered with. Many animals need vast, unadulterated spaces in which to thrive, the grizzly and the wolf are good examples. Let’s learn from the good we’ve done for certain species in certain areas of the country and apply those same philosophies everywhere, while we still can. Let’s say “No” to human encroachment and the “checker-boarding” of what is still open space in Africa. Animals can’t read signs or understand the meaning of fences. Let’s learn to see things through their eyes. The Africa that most of us conjure when we hear the word is already gone. Dozens of species will reach extinction in the next twenty to thirty years, losing numerous species each year along the way.

When you look upon living amongst these threatened predators, view it as if it were an honor. If you’re not built that way, having enough space to suit your need to dominate less fortunate people is an entitlement which exists only in your mind, Things are good only as long they are designed so you and yours come first. Eradicating these animals is no longer an option, as we’ve at least come that far as a society. There are serious fines and even jail time in store for those convicted of killing a member of any endangered species. In places where bears and wolves once roamed with only the competition from each other to keep their numbers in-line, along with other limitations imposed by the natural world, itself. Ma Nature was doing just fine on her own before she received unwanted help from us. I strongly believe that if you live in areas where you’re likely to cross paths with these animals as their populations have come back to sustainable levels, and you just can’t abide the idea, then move to a more “civilized” place. After all, they are still the places where the majority of people choose to live. Or, you can continue to be different because you never wanted to be a part of the “masses” in the first place. You wanted to be freer, to have more space in which to live and raise a family. I spent much of my life moving to more and more remote settings in Colorado because of my chosen mountain lifestyle, each time shedding a part of Colorado which had become too populated to satisfy my need to live where wilderness and wild things were nearby. This choice was often at the expense of being better compensated for my work. I made these concessions knowingly and, in looking back, I have never regretted any move I chose to make in exchanging what was fast becoming just another part of the “concrete world” for wide open country. The wilder the place the more vested I became in remaining.

On the subject of wildlife conservation, the time to “choose sides” was thirty years ago so that those of us who truly care would have had more time to convince those of you who don’t. What we have instead is a world where few care enough to try and make a difference, and a mass of unmoving apathy…like an elephant sitting atop a mouse.

The time has come to save more than the wolf and grizzly. In the long and arduous process of saving wild things and wild places, we might just be able to save ourselves.

Ghosts of the Winter Sage

Winter Range Near Cortez, Colorado

This is one of my most prized photographs. I wish I had a higher-resolution picture, but, for me, back in 2009, it was either my Blackberry or my faithful 3.2 meg Canon Digital Elf that I kept at all times in the glovebox of my truck. I carried that tiny camera with me since Canon came out with it in the  late 90’s. It was great for just about everything, including shooting video, except in the event that years later I’d want to have some of my many great shots blown-up into something of “wall hanging” size.  Still, I am lucky to have this pic at all as the subjects were virtually impossible to capture without the aid of a good telephoto lens.

I was living and working in Cortez, Colorado, running a new operations office for one of the larger natural gas exploration and production companies in the US. This one was  headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma with operations throughout the Western US, including Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah. My job had me both driving long distances between assets and going back and forth between offices in Bloomfield, New Mexico, Durango, and Cortez in Southwest Colorado. Between where my work has taken me and my outdoor interests and activities, I have had the luxury of seeing wolves, mountain lions, bobcats, lynxes, wolverines, black bears, grizzlies, foxes, coyotes, eagles, ospreys, and virtually every prey species associated with that food chain.

Natural Gas Processing Plant, North-Central Colorado (Courtesy The Williams Compnies)

My piece of the above project in North Central Colorado was relatively small in relation to the  total cost and seven-year build cycle, but it was an important role and pleased me greatly to be a part of such a team of engineers and project managers. Including construction hands, hundreds of people had a hand in the work. I was responsible for designing and building the station inlet and outlet piping and equipment for this plant, which, when completed, became the largest gas processing facility of its kind. The area was called the Piceance Basin, and its location provided me with incredible opportunities to go on long runs with my dog and view untold numbers of elk and deer, and make the drive to flyfish the Flaming Gorge of the Green River, in Utah. Traveling to and from the site from my office in Cortez gave me even more wildlife viewing opportunities, including herds of wild horses in the distance. Unlike the rough, high desert ecosystems of so many other places that contained these animals, I can remember thinking that these wild horses (in the Piceance Basin of Central Colorado) had it made. Plenty of grass, water, and suitable terrain. I don’t think these horses had cause for much travel and probably lived their lives within thirty miles of their birthplace. But the point I wanted to make here is that oil and gas basins hold plenty of wild horses, thousands, and the horses have remained in this county even during the construction of larger projects and they continue to inhabit these pockets of extractive industry like mining and oil and gas production. Employees generally leave these horses alone, so their fear of mankind appeared to be non-existent. As long as they are left to be wild horses and do as wild horses do, they have no reason to move from a perfectly good area. There were large pockets of private range held by the nearby ranching community, so these horses had abundant access to those lands, and the area got plenty of snow and rain each year to keep the tall grasses in excellent condition. Unlike other parts of Colorado and certainly rangeland in Nevada and Utah where there is too much competition from both wild and domesticated animals, such as sheep and cattle, where the rangeland and all the creatures it supports are in serious need of management.

Over the span of thirty years in Colorado, I have had many otherwise rare opportunities to view thousands of animals in their natural environs. Wild horses were among the rarest. The picture was taken in an area I had come to know well. It is on a slice of BLM land which adjoins the Southern Ute Native American Reservation to the south and the protection of Mesa Verde National Park to the east. The entry to this particular area was accessed via BLM road that was often open to the public. I would hike with my girlfriend and dogs, go for extended runs and ride both my mountain and motocross bikes all over the related trails. Seldom did I encounter another human being and it had become an area I felt quite strongly about. If I did run into anyone, it would be a hunter, or two, in the area to hunt coyotes. I was a hunter myself, purely elk, and almost exclusivley good-sized bulls during the month long archery season, and, while I am vehemently opposed to hunting coyotes for sport, their populations do need to be maintained and, in Colorado, a bounty could be applied to a corpse as long as the hunter held to the strict number of animals they could take with the proper licensing. Contrary to public opinion, these guys don’t tend to be monsters but are out enjoying nature in a fairly pure form, not leaving messes of campsite garbage in the field or, the thing that bugs me most, making all sorts of noise or breaking out a boombox and knocking back a few beers, and “plinking” (walking around with a smaller caliber gun and shooting at old cans and bottles scattered about these kinds of areas) which really weren’t far outside the city limits). Depending upon where you are, the combination of drinking and shooting is 4illegal and I’ve put an end to these nefarious activities myself on many occasions.

This particular location had become somewhat sacred to me because BLM could decide on any given day to close the main access gate out by the highway, so I didn’t want some group of lawbreakers ruining the access for everyone else. It was just a ten minute drive for me to get there and park, and take off on a long run with my dogs. You could say that I was vested in the place and didn’t want to lose such a recreational opportunity so close to home, particularly since I effectively had my own splinter-herd of wild horses to enjoy. Since I mostly ran with my dogs, I had them trained to leave the wild horses alone, but that was only when I made sure to keep us well away from them, at least by a quarter-mile, or so. While with the dogs, I maintained a rule for the three of us that we never got close enough to bother them in any way.

But there were days when I purposefully went alone to stalk  this small herd to get in close enough to observe them for a couple and hours and, with any luck, snap a few good photos. As part of the greater Mesa Verde herd, they numbered between ten and fifteen individuals with the usual hierarchy, a single stallion and possibly a smaller stallion as tolerated by the big stallion, six or eight mares and several offspring. Depending on the time of year, this would include a couple of this year’s foals and several yearlings from the previous year. This is what the herd would be comprised of at its healthiest. Some days I’d have to run several miles, including some doubling back, before I’d spot them amongst the thick pinon, juniper, and sage. Rarely were they out in the open sage as they are shown in the photograph, but it had snowed several inches of heavy, wet snow overnight and the change to morning temperature had come up just enough to cultivate a thick fog which gave them a sense of security. Plus, they were cold from the hard night and needed to be up and about grazing and trying to get warm, catching whatever few rays of sun making their way through the low-slung clouds. There was no wind, so it was an absolutely perfect opportunity to close most of the distance by walking through a draw filled with pinon trees and rocks. I knew this draw, and by the time it ended, I would be within seventy five yards of them. I remained in the cover of the top of the draw and watched them mill about, pawing the ground to get at the grass beneath. I probably observed them for an hour before the urge to carefully approach and try to get a series of pics took over.

This would be the closest I’d gotten to them. I crested the head of the draw and, standing behind a couple of small pinon trees, I slowly stepped out into the open and stopped, just standing there looking disinterested and away. Two things could happen. They could quickly collect themselves and bolt or, because I wasn’t acting like a predator trying to sneak up closer and I was in the open, in full view, coupled with the idea that these horses had gotten to know me at a greater distance, they might just hold their ground and let me approach by another ten or fifteen yards. I did not want to blow this opportunity, so I decided I’d go roughly ten more yards and take some photos. It was frustrating not having a camera with a powerful zoom where I would have remained in the sanctity of the head of the draw and gotten my pictures from there. But getting this close had worked in my favor because I got to watch them form a defensive circle, with the powerful gray stallion pointing himself toward me and the mares closing-up around the young. The lieutenant took a spot toward the back of the circle. I was now standing about fifty yards away and had begun taking pictures. I was pretty certain that they wouldn’t oblige me for long, so, after ten minutes, the lead mare gave the sign and began to walk off with the others falling in behind, and the stallion remaining in back, always between me and his harem. I marveled at his size, looking very much like a weight-lifter on steroids. His head, neck, shoulders and hind quarters were massive and obvious even under his thick winter coat. I watched until they all but disappeared into the mist and walked the two miles back to my truck. I’d been fortunate to locate them so close to the BLM road that morning. They could have just as easily been five or six miles into the sage to the south.

I’d had a triumphant morning but, because of the dim lighting conditions and snowy, monochromatic background, this one pic was the best I could get. I couldn’t wait to get home and tell my girlfriend of the encounter. It was an extremely rare glimpse into the lives of wild horses.

The plight of the Amican Wild Horse goes back for centuries. Among scholars, it is generally thought that the American Wild Horse is a descendent of those horses which came over during the discovery of the New World by the Spanish in the fourteenth century not long before the Aztec and Mayan peoples of Central America and Mexico vanished, many due to European disease brought to the shores of North America by the Conquistadors and other conquering factions, there were thousands of horses left behind, never to be shipped back to where they came. I could certainly be wrong about this as it flies in the face of what has been historically taught by people far more educated on the subject than me, but I believe that rather than a few horses wandering off and becoming feral, I contend that it was hundreds, if not thousands purposefully left behind rather than taking up valuable cargo space on the returning vessels headed back to their native European empires. It didn’t make economic or pratical sense to round them all up and return them by ship to their native lands while most of the explorers would be returning by the skin of their teeth with all sorts of plunder. It takes a lot of effort to hunt-down and annihilate or enslave tens of thousands of lesser armed natives. There would be additional militant explorers traveling further and further north over the following centuries and, by then, native American cultures in Northern Mexico and the what would later become the Great American Southwest had discovered these beautiful creatures of European descent roaming about by the thousands. Over the next several hundred years, many of these horses would be domesticated and become the single greatest factor in the advancement of the American Indian Horse Culture, which now spanned any number of tribes from the Great Plains in the heart of America to the great Pacific Ocean of what would eventually become California, Oregon, and Washington. The wild horses continued to evolve into mixed-breeds from various parts of Europe into a slightly smaller and stockier lineage that was predominantly from being once domesticated on the European continent and various other places in the world that had specialized in breeding their horses for a number of different purposes, to going back into the melting pot to take on new traits, as dictated by the new environments they found themselves in. Over the course of the next three-hundred years, more horses were brought to the Eastern shores of the New World, some of which would invariably spill into the American West both during and after the Indian Wars when various strains of horses from around the world were unleashed onto the Western landscape. There were also horses left behind from the American Civil War. As these horses were captured and reintroduced to domestication, the American West became a giant crucible of domestication and breeding.

All sorts of factors would define what would become the American mustang and what their regional popultions might be at a given time. As natural predators were eradicated throughout the Western United States and the cycle of naturally occurring fire had changed drastically due to larger and larger areas of white settlement, the ecology behind the history of the American Wild Horse became tremendously complicated and mired in debate. I will not attempt to cover it here. Suffice it to say that Wild Horse management is complex and seldom will you find three experts in ten who agree on the kinds of policies that need to float to the top and become legislation. Combine that with the fact that environmental conditions for these animals change considerably from region to region and state to state. Each herd has its own set of special circumstances that combine to help that herd thrive or see it struggle, on the edge of oblivion.

The thing that I find most disconcerting is the language used on the many sides to the equation is different when it comes to defining what species of flora and fauna are truly native to this part of the world. This is because species that are determined to be native get first billing when it comes to the level of managed protection they are given. The debaters tend to throw wild horses (and centuries old populations of wild burro) in with cattle and sheep, though one could argue that wild horses have been here far (hundreds of years) longer. If the legislators at the top of the food chain were to view this one difference as point of fact and were to capitulate, it would change everything downstream of that single perception. But even this gets complicated because of good, old fashioned American capitalism. Ranchers of both cattle and sheep are paying custumers when if comes to range management policies. Though each rancher pays an inordinately small contribution to operate their leases on BLM and Forest Service lands, as a whole, it amounts to a tastey sum of funds for the goverenment. There are no users of public lands that pay the way for their precious Wild Horses and these animals, all ungulates, compete for the same grass and water, which, in the drought-stricken west, is at an all time premium. Still, look at the term “Wild Horses” and you’ll see the word “Wild” as the chosen descriptor. We all know that these animals represent the truest form of wildness, as we look upon them with nothing short of awe. I think we’d all agree that there is nothing more breathtaking in this world than fixing our gaze on a herd of wild horses out doing their thing, “being wild”. Why would we dare think that these animals don’t deserve every protection afforded other wild and native creatures?

_______

Some facts as put forth by Wild Horse Advocate Laura Moretti:

“Fifty million years ago, a small dog-like creature called Eohippus evolved on the North American continent. In fact, this forerunner to the modern horse was traced to the Tennessee Valley. After evolving into Equus and disappearing into Asia and Africa presumably 11 to 13 thousand years ago, the horse returned to our soil with the Spanish in the early 1500s. From their hands, a few escaped onto the American canvas and reverted to a wild state.”

“According to Western writer J. Frank Dobie, their numbers in the 19th century reached more than 2 million. But by the time the wild horse received federal protection in 1971, it was officially estimated that only about 17,000 of them roamed America’s plains. More than 1 million had been conscripted for World War I combat; the rest had been hunted for their flesh, for the chicken feed and dog food companies, and for the sport of it. They were chased by helicopters and sprayed with buckshot; they were run down with motorized vehicles and, deathly exhausted, weighted with tires so they could be easily picked up by rendering trucks. They were run off cliffs, gunned down at full gallop, shot in corralled bloodbaths, and buried in mass graves.”

“Like the bison, the wild horse had been driven to the edge. Enter Velma Johnston, a.k.a. “Wild Horse Annie.” After seeing blood coming from a livestock truck, she followed it to a rendering plant and discovered how America’s wild horses were being pipelined out of the West. Her crusade led to the passage of a 1959 law that banned the use of motorized vehicles and aircraft to capture wild horses. In the end, it was public outcry that ended the open-faced carnage — and it came from the nation’s schoolchildren and their mothers: in 1971, more letters poured into Congress over the plight of wild horses than any other non-war issue in U.S. history; there wasn’t a single dissenting vote, and one congressman alone reported receiving 14,000 letters. President Nixon signed the bill into law on December 15, 1971. And so the Wild Free-Roaming Horse & Burro Actwas passed, declaring that “wild horses and burros are living symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West; that they contribute to the diversity of life forms within the Nation and enrich the lives of the American people; and that these horses and burros are fast disappearing from the American scene.” The Act was later amended by the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978.”

Credit: Laura Moretti in “The History of America’s Wild Horses”, American Wild Horse Conservation

_______

I say, “says who?!”

A quick Copilot AI search reveals these population estimates from the turn of the nineteenth century to most recent estimates. You’ll note that wild horse numbers over the last two hundred years are very similar to estimates of North American Bison over the same period, though I have seen estimates during the highpoint of bison populations as high as sixty million. I have also read 6 million. Who the heck knows except to say that, at their peak, various species of American Bison were found throughout North America and not limited to the American West and they were mighty and many.

Wherever you choose to get your numbers, what is important is that the populations of American Wild Horses have fluctuated wildly over the centuries.

More recent numbers reflect the ongoing policy, efforts (and failures) to manage and protect the wild horse populations in the United States. One thing that stands out since 1971’s Free Roaming Wild Horse and Burro act is the misuse of the term “federal protection”, which is front and center in the language of this act, but has yet to be seen while these horses have been administered by BLM and other agencies acting under the auspices of the federal government.

Because herd numbers naturally vary considerably on their own and land use policy is an ever-changing storm, and, because the wild horse is generally out of the public eye unless it is in severe difficulty (when their numbers drop so low that herd gene pools are no longer viable to create healthy individuals) or someone catches a BLM helicopter which is alamingly close to the horses being rounded up for separation to public sale, or shipment for euthanization, and that one video gets loaded to YouTube and goes viral, the public finally gets to see what’s going on public (BLM administered) range-lands throughout the Western US, every year. The media only covers their plight when numbers become dangerously low or when verifiable reports of mistreatment get leaked to the public. Each time this happens, perhaps once every six to ten years, there is a huge public outcry to save these animals. Things go so far as to get heated between members the government and wild horse advocacies or people who simply care enough about what’s happening to take action and take a militant stance. Personally, I’m currently of that mindset myself and believe, as with many controversial issues, there comes a time when it becomes a final solution. The only solution. The debate has been raging since long before I was born (in 1961) and, while important legislation has been passed which should have been the template for protection of these precious animals, the government allows its agencies free reign in acting in any manner they choose. The time has come for anyone and everyone who feels a deep affinity for these key players in the history of the American West, the beautiful and historically necessary creatures that evolved alongside mankind, to choose a side: that of the American Wild Horse or their nemesis, the United States government. I want nothing more before I pass than to see this issue resolved once and for all, leaving the grandest symbol of the American West to run free for generations to come. I’ve gotten to the point where I don’t care how it happens, as long as it happens. Time always tells and I have a deep-seated feeling that if we simply leave things to time, there will one day soon be no more Wild Horses to debate over. They will be forever lost to time.

Please do something. Give to a wild horse advocacy group, educate yourself on the subject. Go to YouTube and see what happens during these BLM Wild Horse roundups. I guarantee that once you come to know what’s actually happening out there on “Public Lands”, you won’t be able to help yourself from getting involved. Many people travel to these Wild Horse roundups (the times and places are a matter of public record) to prevent mistreatment that would otherwise happen, well away from watchful eyes. The more eyes we put on them along with obtaining the names and positions of those responsible, the more we can provide much needed pushback on agencies such as the BLM and the local infrastructure that is in place for them to hide behind. Many people have a hand in the destruction and are compensated for their part in the doing.

Credit oregonlive.com

Is the Telecaster the Right Choice for my First Guitar?

Originally Posted to Quora

2011 Reclaimed Redwood Telecaster

A Fender Telecaster is a great choice regardless of where you’re at on your guitar journey.

I was so busy with a demanding engineering career and a number of other lifelong interests, I literally chose to wait for retirement before tackling something as immersive and time consuming as learning how to play guitar. But I’ve never done anything partway and knew that if I were going to play guitar, I would be pleased only if I became a bonafide guitarist, a player who would ultimately rank in the upper ten percent of amateur players. So, for my first guitar, I wanted something that could take me as far as I could go. There are obviously a lot of guitars that have the goods for such an endeavor, but I was drawn to the Telecaster in the same way the desert needs rain in order to thrive. I liked everything from the shape of the guitar which makes it comfortable whether standing or sitting and I fell in love with it’s lustrous and robust maple neck (it’s got ’52 specs). I also noticed right away how lightweight they were and this would make my aging back happy. The simplicity of the design was also appealing with not a lot to go wrong. I would be playing blues, country, and Southern rock so a Tele was ideal for the three genres.

About a week after I formally retired, I brought my wife along and spent the entire day messing around with all sorts of guitars. I hadn’t noticed it when we walked into the final store, a Guitar Center, because this particular Telecaster was obscured by a man-sized ad talking about the 50th anniversary of the Telecaster. In all, there would be twelve different Tele’s, one for each month of 2011. These were known as the “Telebration Series”. I knew immediately that the reclaimed redwood version was it and I needn’t shop further. At under seven pounds, it was wonderfully light, and the oil finish they’d used really made the woodgrain pop. I bought a nice twenty watt amp and everything else I would need to get started.

After setting everything up, it was quite late and I went to bed only to rise at 5:30 the following morning. I skipped breakfast and went right to work with the guitar. I played for sixteen hours that first weekend, my fingers painfully bloody and I knew right then and there that I was hooked.

I’ve come a long way since that initial purchase and now consider myself to be an advanced guitarist. I just turned sixty-four and have yet to slow down with the amount that I’ve always played…right around fifteen hours a week. I have nine other very fine electrics and eleven acoustics, but the redwood Tele will always be my favorite. It suits me now in the same way it did in the beginning, fifteen years ago.

So, yes, a Telecaster is THE right choice for a beginning guitarist or the expert axe-man. I can’t think of anything that could possibly make it a better guitar than it already is. In all those years, the only modification that I made was to swap out the ’52 pickups for some hotter Porter T-90’s. The thing just rips!

2011 Taylor GS-6 First Impressions

https://photos.app.goo.gl/nD437KjWwvL1zU6j8

I recently acquired this 2011 Taylor GS-6 from a private seller in Idaho who rarely played it. The guitar is in mint or near-new condition. The build specs are shown among the linked photographs.

It has a beautiful sitka spruce top with abundant siking found throughout. The back and sides of the GS model are comprised of highly figured (in this case, flamed) maple. The flames, or “tiger stripes”, are relatively wide and well defined and the two piece back is bookmatched perfectly, making for an extremely elegant looking guitar.

While not as common as rosewood or mahogany, maple is considered to be an exceptional tone-wood. Though, as a general rule, it is a bit brighter sounding with “janglier” highs and lows (bass notes) having less depth. However, these are general rules governing the dozens of different tone-woods which can be used in the construction of an acoustic guitar. Like the various species of rosewood (cocobolo, Indian, the famed Brazilian, et al) woods that have a stiffer, denser composition tend to yield more cross-sectional strength per sample weight and this is what tends to make a guitar with a wider tonal spectrum with high highs and low lows. Maple is known for its broad and flavorful midrange. But the tonal characteristics of a given guitar are more complicated than when looking from a “materials only” perspective. Internal bracing technique, the overall size and shape of the guitar, and even the type of finish used are all contributors to the tone of any specific guitar. When ordering a custom build, many players choose old-fashioned hide glue over a more modern adhesive type.

I had never even played a maple back and sides guitar but have had it as “an itch to scratch” for many years. I had read what few reviews and listened to as many video clips as I could find on the GS-6 and determined that this make and model (a rather large guitar) wasn’t thought of as too bright. Different from what I was accustomed to, yes, but in only the best of ways. I probably have twenty hours of play time on the guitar and could not be more pleased with the tone or the playability. I can see it as having a place in my collection for many years to come. In terms of raw sex appeal, the GS-6 is one drop-dead-gorgeous guitar, the kind of guitar that says “pick me up” every time you walk by!

For more photos of the newest addition to my collection, click on the link inserted at the beginning. Located at Lonesome Dove, Texas, on the escarpment leading up to Texas’s famed Hill Country and the world renowned mecca for roots, blues, folk, country, and blues-blues rock music, Austin.